- Abstract. In survivorship modelling using the proportional hazards model of Cox (1972, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34, 187-220), it is often desired to test a subset of the vector of unknown regression parameters β in the expression for the hazard rate at time t. The likelihood ratio test statistic is well behaved in most.
- Wald Likelihood ratio methods Score tests Score and log-rank tests Consider the Cox regression score test in the special case with only one covariate, an indicator function In that case, the Cox score statistic for testing H 0: = 0 is u(0) = X j (x j E jx) = X j d 1j d j n 1j n j ; or Wfrom the log-rank test Thus, the Cox regression score test is in some sense equivalen
- performs the likelihood ratio test, Wald's test and the score test The semiparametric Cox proportional hazards model is the most commonly used model in hazard regression. In this model, the conditional hazard function, given the covariate value , is assumed to be of the for
- The Wald statistics you referred (only one value) should be the test for the overall goodness of fit of your Cox-model. The log-rank test to compared survival curves is ok, but don't forget to.

- The Cox proportional-hazards model (Cox, 1972) is essentially a regression model commonly used statistical in medical research for investigating the association between the survival time of patients and one or more predictor variables
- For example, the Wald test is commonly used to perform multiple degree of freedom tests on sets of dummy variables used to model categorical variables in regression (for more information see our webbook on Regression with Stata, specifically Chapter 3 - Regression with Categorical Predictors)
- The Wald test has application in many areas of statistical modelling. Any time a likelihood based approach is used for estimation (e.g., logistic regression, Poisson regression, the partial.
- The difference is that the Wald test can be used to test multiple parameters simultaneously, while the tests typically printed in regression output only test one parameter at a time. Returning to our example, we will use a statistical package to run our model and then to perform the Wald test
- Överlevnadsanalys (survival analysis)- Från Kaplan-Meier till Cox regression. Överlevnadsanalys är ett kraftfullt verktyg för att studera händelser (events).Centralt för överlevnadsanalys är information om observationstid.Man studerar nämligen alltid tid till att en händelse inträffar

Cox Regression builds a predictive model for time-to-event data. The model produces a survival function that predicts the probability that the event of interest has occurred at a given time t for given values of the predictor variables. The shape of the survival function and the regression coefficients for the predictors are estimated from observed. Wald Test The Wald test will be familiar to those who use multiple regression. In multiple regression, the common t-test for testing the significance of a particular regression coefficient is a Wald test. In Cox regression, the Wald test is calculated in the same manner. The formula for the Wald statistic is z b j s j b j = where s b The global Wald test of your Cox model is whether any of the coefficients in different from zero, using the statistic calculated from the formula shown at the beginning of this answer. That answer goes on to illustrate the situation for one specific coefficient. So these are both Wald tests, but applied to different combinations of coefficients One way to see this is to note that even with complete separation, which occurs more often with logistic models than with Cox, the LR test is fully accurate whereas standard errors used in Wald tests blow up rendering Wald tests useless when complete separation (infinite regression coefficient estimates) is in play

In statistics, the Wald test assesses constraints on statistical parameters based on the weighted distance between the unrestricted estimate and its hypothesized value under the null hypothesis, where the weight is the precision of the estimate. Intuitively, the larger this weighted distance, the less likely it is that the constraint is true. While the finite sample distributions of Wald tests are generally unknown, it has an asymptotic χ2-distribution under the null hypothesis. Cox proportional hazards regression model The Cox PH model • is a semiparametric model • makes no assumptions about the form of h(t) (non- Wald test = 13.5 on 2 df, p=0.00119 Score (logrank) test = 18.6 on 2 df, p=9.34e-05 BIOST 515, Lecture 17 7. Interpreting the output from * Cox Regression Models*. 7.* Cox Regression Models*. (Part II) Tied Data. In practice, it is quite common for our data to contain tied survival times. Therefore, we need a different technique to construct the partial likelihood in the presence of tied data. Patient 1 11 1. 2 21 2 This procedure performs Cox (proportional hazards) regression analysis, which models the relationship between a set of one or more covariates and the hazard rate. Covariates may be discrete or continuous. Cox's proportional hazards regression model is solved using the method of marginal likelihood outlined in Kalbfleisch (1980)

Whereas the test for the individual hazard ratio is based on Wald test which is testing whether the individual hazard coefficient is zero or not. The null hypothesis for the wald test is the coefficient is zero. The Wald test is : \( \frac{coeff}{std.err(coeff)} \sim N(0,1)\) t P>|t| [95% Conf. Interval] -----+----- sex | -2.834713 1.278317 -2.22 0.034 -5.441858 -.2275678 height | -.4850167 .0643537 -7.54 0.000 -.616267 -.3537664 age | 3.697388 .2029113 18.22 0.000 3.283548 4.111228 age2 | -.0276003 .0020215 -13.65 0.000 -.0317232 -.0234773 _cons | 198.7973 12.92889 15.38 0.000 172.4286 225.1659 ----- . test age age2 Adjusted Wald test ( 1) age = 0 ( 2) age2 = 0 F. A Cox model with change-point in covariate is considered at which the pattern of the change-point effects can be flexibly specified. To test for the existence of the change-point effects, three statistical tests, namely, the maximal score, maximal normalized score, and maximal Wald tests are proposed Wald test | Likelihood ratio test | Score test - YouTube Wald test on the coeﬃcient of lBUN, β1, estimated from the Cox model in the presence of other covariates. Main study parameters: α= 0.05 , 1 −β= 0.8 , β 1a = 1 , σ= 0.3126

- The Cox proportional-hazards model (Cox, 1972) is essentially a regression model commonly used statistical in medical research for investigating the association between the survival time of patients and one or more predictor variables.. In the previous chapter (survival analysis basics), we described the basic concepts of survival analyses and methods for analyzing and summarizing survival.
- An object of class
**wald.test**, printed with print.**wald**.**test**. Details. The key assumption is that the coefficients asymptotically follow a (multivariate) normal distribution with mean = model coefficients and variance = their var-cov matrix. One (and only one) of Terms or L must be given - When positivity does not hold, the estimator of regression coefficients will be biased. But if all the covariates are independent in the population, the Wald test performed by this function is still valid and can be used for testing partial hypotheses about regression coefficients even in the absence of positivity

You can use wald statistics, and likelihood ratio test that have asymptotically chi-squared distributions in linear regression. But, when data is normal distributed, then it is possible to use the exact distributions (not relying on asymptotic results). Therefore, you use t-statistics and F-test in linear regression as it is more exact Key concepts and terminology for hazards models General background on hazards models Models to analyze the time to occurrence of events are known variously as hazards models (including Cox proportional hazards models), duration models, Cox regression, survival models, event history models, and failure time models (Allison 1995; Maciejewski 2002).The dependent variable in

In clinical trials with time to an event endpoint, the Wald test in a Cox regression model may be used to assess the difference between two treatments. In this paper, a Bartlett type correction to the Wald test is derived and applied to the analysis of data from a clinical trial on actuate myelogenous leukemia (AML) The Wald test for an individual predictor compares the coefficient to its standard error, just like a t test in linear regression. The likelihood ratio test compares the entire model to the null model (intercept-only). Again, run an ANOVA (technically an analysis of deviance) to get more details on the likelihood-ratio test wald.test: Wald Test for Model Coefficients Description. Computes a Wald \(\chi^2\) test for 1 or more coefficients, given their variance-covariance matrix. Usage wald.test(Sigma, b, Terms = NULL, L = NULL, H0 = NULL, df = NULL, verbose = FALSE) # S3 method for wald.test print(x, digits = 2,) Argument When proportional hazard assumption holds, log rank test is equivalent to Score test in Cox regression. 1, 2 Alternatively the comparison can be tested using Wald test. Both tests generate consistent results. 3 However their finite sample properties may be difficult to derive due to censoring. Cox regression is a maximum partial likelihood approach

- Cox's proportional hazards regression Worked example 1 These are hypothetical data on the ten-year survival of children born with Down syndrome ; they are loosely based on a recent study carried out in Ireland We have focused on two factors known to affect survival of children suffering from this disease - serious heart defects (CAVD) and leukemia
- The regression shows the dependent variable standard deviation and from crisis until future_crisis_team the independent ones we want to interpret. The ones later are control variables and not of primary interest. Then you can see the wald test. The result of the wald test is: F( 1, 207) = 0.76 Prob > F = 0.3836 So now I have the significance, right
- Survey: Linear regression Number of obs = 56,345 Population size = 413,128,910,720 Replications = 160 Wald chi2(2) = 1855.56 Prob > chi2 = 0.0000 R-squared = 0.0470-----| SDR erbmi | Coef. Std. Err. z P>|z| [95% Conf. Interval
- time. The Cox proportional-hazards regression model is the most common tool for studying the dependency of survival time on predictor variables. This appendix to Fox and Weisberg (2019) brie y describes the basis for the Cox regression model, and explains how to use the survival package in R to estimate Cox regressions. 1 Introductio
- This function fits Cox's proportional hazards model for survival-time (time-to-event) outcomes on one or more predictors. Cox regression (or proportional hazards regression) is method for investigating the effect of several variables upon the time a specified event takes to happen. In the context of an outcome such as death this is known as Cox.
- The Cox PH regression model is a linear model. It is similar to linear regression and logistic regression. Specifically, these methods assume that a single line, curve, plane, or surface is sufficient to separate groups (alive, dead) or to estimate a quantitative response (survival time)

The two tests commonly used in the tests of hypotheses in logistic regression are the Wald test and the likelihood ratio test (LRT). We are interested in testing the null hypothesis that the coefficient of the independent variable is equal to zero versus the alternative hypothesis that the coefficient is nonzero — that is Whereas the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test is useful for comparing survival curves in two or more groups, Cox regression (or Cox proportional hazards model) allows analyzing the effect of several risk factors on survival. The probability of the endpoint (death, or any other event of interest, e.g. recurrence of disease) is called the. LR and Wald give same conclusion. Stratified Cox regression Analysis time _t: survt LR = (−2 × −59.648) − (−2 × −57.560) = 119.296 − 115.120 = 4.179 (P < 0.05) ˆ HR for effect of Rx adjusted for log WBC and sex: eβˆ 1 where β 1 is the coefficient of Rx. An alternative test involves a likelihood ratio (LR After Build Survival Model (Cox Regression) dialog is opened, follow the steps below to build Survival Model. Select survival time column with Survival Time (Time to Event) dropdown. Select survival status column with Survival Status (Event) dropdown. Select Predictor Columns in Predictor section

- Wald test for a term in a regression model Description. Provides Wald test and working likelihood ratio (Rao-Scott) test of the hypothesis that all coefficients associated with a particular regression term are zero (or have some other specified values). Particularly useful as a substitute for anova when not fitting by maximum likelihood
- The original paper by D.R. Cox Regression models and life tables is one of the most cited papers. Paired with the Kaplan-Meier method (and the log-rank test), the Cox proportional hazards model is the cornerstone for the survival analyses or all analyses with time to event endpoints
- The Wald test now yields -0.73 (a chi-squared of 0.53), and the likelihood ratio test concurs, with a chi-squared of 0.54 on one d.f. The estimated risk ratio is larger after 10 weeks, but the difference is not significant. Note that these are exactly the same results we got with tvc () and texp ()
- regTermTest: Wald test for a term in a regression model Description Provides Wald test and working Wald and working likelihood ratio (Rao-Scott) test of the hypothesis that all coefficients associated with a particular regression term are zero (or have some other specified values)
- The default hypothesis tests that software spits out when you run a regression model is the null that the coefficient equals zero. Frequently there are other more interesting tests though, and this is one I've come across often -- testing whether two coefficients are equal to one another. The big point to remember is tha

- This video provides a demonstration of the use of Cox Proportional Hazards (regression) model based on example data provided in Luke & Homan (1998). A copy.
- One way to model the risk is using
**Cox****regression**, which we describe in this post. We then show a simple example. We describe the instantaneous risk of an event via a function called the hazard. Likelihood ratio**test**= 14.29 on 2 df, p=8e-04**Wald****test**= 10.54 on 2 df, p=0.005 Score (logrank)**test**= 12.26 on 2 df, p=0.002 Only. - Log rank test is commonly used to compare treatments with respect to some time to event end points such as progression free survival or overall survival. When proportional hazard assumption holds, log rank test is equivalent to Score test in Cox regression.1,2 Alternatively the comparison can be tested using Wald test. Both tests
- Jennings (1986) showed that Wald's test statistic decreases to zero as the distance between the parameter estimate and null value increases. This behavior of Wald's test occurs in logistic regression, when the response rate of one of the two treatments closes to one. In the Cox re-gression the same behavior of the Wald's test exists whe
- comparison is the Wald test. At least two other statistical tests are also readily available for the logistic regression procedure: the LR test and the score test (Lagrange multiplier test). The Wald, LR, and score tests are asymptotically equivalent (Cox & Hinkley, 1974). Which of the three tests is preferable depends on the situation
- The Wald test The Wald test uses test statistic: T(Y) = ^ 0 SEc: The recipe: I If the true parameter was 0, then the sampling distribution of the Wald test statistic should be approximately N(0;1). I Look at the observed value of the test statistic; call it T obs. I Under the null, jT obsj 1:96 with probability 0.95. I So if we reject the null when jT obsj>1:96, the size of the test
- Dear all, I'm using the package Survival to perform Cox regression analysis. Until now, I've gotten the results successfully. But I still have a question of the results: As is shown in the picture below, the overall P-value (0.1122) of Lymnodes_status is different from P-value of Lymphnodes_status=positive (0.101). what's the reason of this.

10.8 Cox proportional hazards regression. The Cox proportional hazards model is a regression model similar to those we have already dealt with. It is commonly used to investigate the association between the time to an event (such as death) and a set of explanatory variables I would like to do a simple joint Wald test on my fixed-effects regression coefficients but I want to set the restriction to something other than zero. More specifically I would like to test: H0: ai=0 and b=1 for every i or basically, whether the extracted intercepts from fixed effects model. Hello. I ran a Cox Regression in which the convergence was satisfied. In the Type 3 Tests portion of the output, two of my independent variables (coded categorically), have dots where the Wald Chi-Square and Pr >ChiSq results should be. I can't figure out why SAS did not calculate results for these. ** Usually the Wald, likelihood ratio, and score tests are covered**. In this post I'm going to revise the advantages and disadvantages of the Wald and likelihood ratio test. I will focus on confidence intervals rather than tests, because the deficiencies of the Wald approach are more transparently seen here I am trying to do a Wald test for a panel logit model returned by the pglm() function. Unfortunately, there is no standard Wald test method defined in the package for the maxLik object returned by the function. I would be thankful for suggestions on how to perform a Wald test for a pglm maxLik object. My formula is

formal test statistics such as the Likelihood ratio test (LRT), the Wald test and the Score test to examine both simple null hypothesis and composite null hy-pothesis. To illustrate these procedures, we will be using publicly available data. In Chapter 3, we will study all the proposed methods for checking log-linearity of the Cox regression I have run Cox regression with death as my outcome: my main exposure of interest is a a continuous variable (IGF) I have other covariates in the model - I will just refer to two of them, race (5 level) and tumor stage (2 level) Xi: stcox igf i.race i.stage I did the main analysis, and then did some exploratory subgroup analysis, with the usual caveats of smaller sample sizes and using a more conservative P value Eg Xi: stcox igf i.race if stage==1 However a reviewer gave the comment ' what. A robust signi cance testing method for the Cox regression model, based on a modi ed Wald test statistic, is discussed. Using Monte Carlo experiments the asymptotic behavior of the modi ed robust ver-sions of the Wald statistic is compared with the standard signi cance test for the Cox model based on the log likelihood ratio test statistic

Exact Logistic Regression and Exact Poisson However, the Wald test does not reject this null hypothesis. The seemingly conﬂicting conclusions of these tests are a sign that the large-sample taken from Cox and Snell (1989, pp. 9-10) , consists of the number, Notready, of ingot Cox proportional hazards regression (time to event data) What does Cox Contrast Test Results Contrast DF Wald Chi-Square Pr > ChiSq NMA vs. RIC 1 3.0053 0.0830 There is no statistically significant difference in mortality between NMA and RIC conditioning regimens (RR=1.351, 95

The cox_zph() function tests the proportional hazards assumption (PHA) of a Cox regression. Proportional-hazard models enable the comparison of various survival models. These PH models, however, assume that the hazard for a given individual is a fixed proportion of the hazard for any other individual, and the ratio of the hazards is constant across time Cox Regression . Introduction . Cox Suppose you want to test the null hypothesis that . hypothesis using a 5% significance level with a two-sided Wald test. They decide to calculate the power at sample sizes between 5 and 250. Setup This section presents the values of each of the parameters needed to run this example

This is the same as conducting two one-sided tests of the null hypotheses using the Wald test. If both of these one-sided tests are rejected, we conclude H1 that the two groups are equivalent ( their Two-Sample Equivalence Tests for Survival Data using Cox Regression 2. TY - JOUR AU - Tadeusz Bednarski AU - Filip Borowicz TI - On a robust significance test for the Cox regression model JO - Discussiones Mathematicae Probability and Statistics PY - 2006 VL - 26 IS - 2 SP - 221 EP - 233 AB - A robust significance testing method for the Cox regression model, based on a modified Wald test statistic, is discussed. Using Monte Carlo experiments the asymptotic.

how to check linearity in Cox regression. Hi, I am just wondering if there is a test available for testing if a linear fit of an independent variable in a Cox Likelihood ratio test= 15.4 on 2 df, p=0.00046 Wald test = 17.4 on 2 df, p=0.00017 Score (logrank) test = 17.3 on 2 df, p=0.000175 > anova(fit1, fit2 , test = Chisq). Aim: The value of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET for the prognosis of conversion from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's dementia (AD) is controversial. In the present work, the identification of cerebral metabolic patterns with significant prognostic value for conversion of MCI patients to AD is investigated with voxel-based Cox regression, which in contrast to common. R.Niketta Logistische Regression Beispiel_logistische_Regression.doc Kommentierter SPSS-Ausdruck zur logistischen Regression Daten: Cox & Snell R-Quadrat Nagelkerkes R-Quadrat 1 196.961(a) den Standardfehler prüft der Wald-Test, ob die einzelnen Prädiktoren einen signifikante

- Logistic regression is useful for situations in which you want to be able to predict the presence or absence of a characteristic or outcome based on values of a set of predictor variables. It is similar to a linear regression model but is suited to models where the dependent variable is dichotomous
- Cox regression, does not account for random effects. Mixed effects cox regression, the focus of this page. ## Rsquare= 0.076 (max possible= 0.98 ) ## Likelihood ratio test= 59.5 on 3 df, p=7.48e-13 ## Wald test = 61.2 on 3 df, p=3.25e-13 ## Score (logrank) test = 63.6 on 3 df, p=9.91e-14.
- Cox-Regression Cox-Modelle Parameter-schätzung Bindungen Tests for β = 0 Wald-Test für Koefﬁzienten Analysis of Deviance Konﬁdenzintervalle Stratiﬁzierung Links-zensierung Statistische Analyse von Ereigniszeiten II Cox-Regression Analysis Werner Brannath VO Biostatistik im WS 2006/2007
- Homework help for this model in particular is usually accompanied with logarithmic regressions, due to the exponential in manner of the cox regression. Assignment help of this kind is usually accompanied with chi-square distribution tests for the Wald test of the model coefficients as well as likelihood ratio tests to compare cox regressions
- The multinom package does not include p-value calculation for the regression coefficients, so we calculate p-values using Wald tests (here z-tests). # Load the multinom package library (nnet) # Since we are going to use Academic as the reference group, we need relevel the group. hsb $ prog2 <- relevel ( as.factor (hsb $ prog), ref = 2 ) hsb $ ses <- as.factor (hsb $ ses) levels (hsb $ prog2
- Analysieren > Regression > Binär signifikant sind. Dabei wird für jeden der Regressionskoeffizienten ein Wald-Test durchgeführt. Die Teststatistik des Wald-Tests wird Es gibt eine grosse Anzahl verschiedener solcher Pseudo-R 2 - zwei davon sind in SPSS implementiert: das Cox und Snell R 2 und das Nagelkerke R 2. Das Cox.

- Downloadable (with restrictions)! In clinical trials with time to an event endpoint, the Wald test in a Cox regression model may be used to assess the difference between two treatments. In this paper, a Bartlett type correction to the Wald test is derived and applied to the analysis of data from a clinical trial on actuate myelogenous leukemia (AML)
- HYPOTHESIS TESTS SISCR 2019: Module 6: Intro Survival Elizabeth Brown Three tests of H0: = 0 are possible: 1. Wald test: ˆ se(ˆ) 2. (Partial) Likelihood ratio test 3. Score test: (⇡ logrank test) Likelihood ratio test is best, but requires ﬁtting full ( = ˆ) and reduced ( = 0) models. 4 -2
- Likelihood ratio test= 41.6 on 4 df, p=2e-08 Wald test = 39.4 on 4 df, p=5.72e-08 Score (logrank) test = 46.7 on 4 df, p=1.79e-09 Cox regression - p. 19/4
- Corrections. All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsj:stbull:y:2000:v:9:i:54:sg131.See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.. For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title.
- RegressionResults.wald_test(r_matrix, cov_p=None, scale=1.0, invcov=None, use_f=None, df_constraints=None) ¶. Compute a Wald-test for a joint linear hypothesis. Parameters. r_matrix{array_like, str, tuple} One of: array : An r x k array where r is the number of restrictions to test and k is the number of regressors
- Cox Regression (cont'd) • The Cox Model is different from ordinary regression in that the covariates are used to predict the hazard function, and not Y itself. • The baseline hazard function can take any form, but it cannot be negative. • The exponential function of the covariates is used to insure that the hazard is positive

Cox regression (tjZ) = 0(t)expf Zg Here for simplicity we rst assume Zof dimension one and time-independent. (Recall) Schoenfeld residual r i( ^) = Z i E ^ (ZjX i); where E (Zjt) = P j2R(t) Z je Zj P j2R(t) e Zj Now E 0(Zjt) = P j2R(t) Z j=jR(t)jis the empirical aver-age of the Z's in the risk set at time t, corresponding to = 0. Let r i(0) = Z i E 0(ZjX i) the method of partial likelihood , developed by Cox (1972) in the same paper in which he introduced the Cox model. Although the resulting estimates are not as eﬃcient as maximum-likelihood estimates for a correctly speciﬁed parametric hazard regression model, not having to make arbitrary, and possibly incorrect Wald-Type Tests for Detecting Breaks in the Trend Function of a Dynamic Time Series - Volume 13 Issue 6 Skip to main content Accessibility help We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites

Statsmodels - Wald Test for significance of trend in coefficients in Linear Regression Model (OLS) Tag: python , statistics , linear-regression , statsmodels I have used Statsmodels to generate a OLS linear regression model to predict a dependent variable based on about 10 independent variables This paper investigates a modified version of the Wald test of regression disturbances. The Monte Carlo results in the context of testing for MA(1) regression disturbances show that the modified Wald tests always have monotonic increasing power Wald test = 12.4 on 1 df, p=0.000439 Score (logrank) test = 15.2 on 1 df, p=9.43e-05 Intervalo de conança para taxa de falha relativa Testes de Wald global (no caso é igual ao individual) Teste de Rao-Escore (no caso igual ao log-rank) MAE 514 - Introdução à Análise de Sobrevivência e Aplicações Modelo de Regressão de Cox The table also includes the test of significance for each of the coefficients in the logistic regression model. For small samples the t-values are not valid and the Wald statistic should be used instead. Wald is basically t² which is Chi-Square distributed with df=1. However, SPSS gives the significance levels of each coefficient Cox Regression, also known as Cox proportional hazard regression, assumes that if the proportional hazards assumption holds (or, is assumed to hold), then it is possible to estimate the effect parameter(s) without any consideration of the hazard function

test.ph - cox.zph(res.cox) test.ph rho chisq p age -0.0483 0.378 0.538 sex 0.1265 2.349 0.125 wt.loss 0.0126 0.024 0.877 GLOBAL NA 2.846 0.416 From the output above, the test is not statistically significant for each of the covariates, and the global test is also not statistically significant Wald 2.9254 1 0.0872 Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates Parameter Standard Hazard test in the Cox regression analysis is identical to the log-rank test. The advantage of the Cox regression approach is the ability to adjust for the other variables by in A Bartlett type correction for Wald test in Cox regression model. Xiao Li, Yaohua Wu and Dongsheng Tu. Statistics & Probability Letters, 2008, vol. 78, issue 16, 2614-2622 Abstract: In clinical trials with time to an event endpoint, the Wald test in a Cox regression model may be used to assess the difference between two treatments